<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Find Better Value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://findbettervalue.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://findbettervalue.com</link>
	<description>A Look at Money, Careers, Life, and Photography</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 (HR 3221) by Top CD Rates</title>
		<link>http://findbettervalue.com/2008/06/27/housing-foreclosure-prevention-act-of-2008-hr-3221/#comment-4787</link>
		<dc:creator>Top CD Rates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://findbettervalue.com/?p=108#comment-4787</guid>
		<description>Michael, are you saying that basically in agreeing to this bail-out the banks will be reporting all payments made, not just the ones on the distressed borrowers?

This is really a bail-out for both the "distressed" and the banks.  The "distressed" will get to keep their home and have the loan re-written at a lower value.  That doesn't seem right.  Since when do you get to go to your bank or credit union and just tell them, I don't want to pay you back $400,000.  I only feel like paying you $200,000.

The banks don't have to take the property back and will probably recover more through the re-written loan than they would otherwise.

It just smells all the way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, are you saying that basically in agreeing to this bail-out the banks will be reporting all payments made, not just the ones on the distressed borrowers?</p>
<p>This is really a bail-out for both the &#8220;distressed&#8221; and the banks.  The &#8220;distressed&#8221; will get to keep their home and have the loan re-written at a lower value.  That doesn&#8217;t seem right.  Since when do you get to go to your bank or credit union and just tell them, I don&#8217;t want to pay you back $400,000.  I only feel like paying you $200,000.</p>
<p>The banks don&#8217;t have to take the property back and will probably recover more through the re-written loan than they would otherwise.</p>
<p>It just smells all the way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 (HR 3221) by BetterValue</title>
		<link>http://findbettervalue.com/2008/06/27/housing-foreclosure-prevention-act-of-2008-hr-3221/#comment-4657</link>
		<dc:creator>BetterValue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 02:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://findbettervalue.com/?p=108#comment-4657</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is one thing I did not bring up.  Many people covering the bill forget to mention that.  If the bill passes, the federal government will know everything we buy online, down to very last widget you bid for on Ebay.  Where are the privacy advocates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is one thing I did not bring up.  Many people covering the bill forget to mention that.  If the bill passes, the federal government will know everything we buy online, down to very last widget you bid for on Ebay.  Where are the privacy advocates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Housing Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008 (HR 3221) by Michael Stapp</title>
		<link>http://findbettervalue.com/2008/06/27/housing-foreclosure-prevention-act-of-2008-hr-3221/#comment-4635</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Stapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://findbettervalue.com/?p=108#comment-4635</guid>
		<description>There is also a provision included that banks, and quasi-banks - like paypal - will be required to report 100% of payments made, reporting the receiving party and their taxpayer identification number.  Translation -- the IRS wants to know every sale made in the country, and they will burden our credit card companies, banks, and quasi-banks with the enforcement.  Just another unfunded mandate transfered from our government to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also a provision included that banks, and quasi-banks - like paypal - will be required to report 100% of payments made, reporting the receiving party and their taxpayer identification number.  Translation &#8212; the IRS wants to know every sale made in the country, and they will burden our credit card companies, banks, and quasi-banks with the enforcement.  Just another unfunded mandate transfered from our government to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
